Aviation Accident Summaries

Aviation Accident Summary ATL96LA067

KINGSTON, TN, USA

Aircraft #1

N78896

Mooney M20C

Analysis

The pilot reported that he had just departed Meadow Lake, and was in cruise flight at about 2,000 feet above ground level when the aircraft engine lost power. He attempted to execute a forced landing in a field. The aircraft struck a utility building during the forced landing. The initial postcrash inspection revealed that the airplane was intact and fuel tanks did not appear to be compromised. The fuel tanks were examined, the right fuel tank contained no fuel, and the left fuel tank contained a small amount of residual fuel. The fuel gauges were inspected, and the right fuel quantity indicator showed full, although there was no fuel in the airplane. The pilot stated he did not perform a complete walk around of the airplane before the flight, or visibly check the fuel quantity. He used only the fuel gauges as a reference for fuel quantity, and thought he had 26 gallons on board before takeoff.

Factual Information

On March 17, 1996, at 1855 eastern standard time, a Mooney M20C, N78896, was substantially damaged following a collision with a building and terrain near Kingston, Tennessee. The commercial pilot received serious injuries, and his passenger received minor injuries in the accident. The aircraft was being operated under the provisions of Title 14 CFR Part 91 by the pilot. Visual meteorological conditions existed, and no flight plan had been filed for the personal flight. The flight departed Meadow Lake, Tennessee, and was destined for Jacksboro, Tennessee. The pilot reported that he had just departed Meadow Lake, and was in cruise flight at about 2000 feet above ground level when the aircraft engine lost power. He attempted to execute a forced landing in a field. The aircraft struck a utility building during the forced landing attempt. The FAA Investigator stated he performed a post crash inspection of the aircraft. He indicated there were no visible signs of leakage from either fuel tank resulting from the accident. The airplane was intact and the fuel tanks did not appear to be compromised. The right fuel tank contained no fuel, and the left fuel tank contained a small amount of residual fuel. The airplane was then hooked up to battery power in order to operate the fuel gauges, and the right fuel quantity indicator showed to be almost full, although there was no fuel in the aircraft. The pilot stated he did not perform a complete walk around of the airplane before flight, or visibly check the fuel quantity. Not knowing the right fuel quantity indicator was not working properly, he used only the fuel gauges as a reference for fuel quantity, and thought he had 26 gallons of fuel on board before takeoff.

Probable Cause and Findings

The pilot's inadequate pre-flight inspection, which resulted in fuel exhaustion. A factor relating to the accident was: the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.

 

Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database

Get all the details on your iPhone or iPad with:

Aviation Accidents App

In-Depth Access to Aviation Accident Reports