Rialto, CA, USA
N6539X
Cessna 210
The airplane collided with ground obstacles following a loss of engine power during a VFR go-around. During a 200-mile instrument cross-country flight, the pilot attempted to lean the mixture while climbing to an altitude of 10,000 feet; however, the engine would sputter and cough. The pilot chose to position the mixture in the "FULL RICH" position. Unable to climb to the appropriate altitude, the pilot canceled his IFR flight plan and continued VFR with flight following. About halfway through the flight, the right wing fuel gage was indicating empty, and though concerned about the apparent abnormal fuel consumption, the pilot decided to continue to his original destination. The fuel selector was then switched to the left fuel tank. At this time, the airplane was flying over several airports with maintenance and fueling facilities. Approaching the destination, the left fuel tank gage was indicating a low quantity and the pilot declared an emergency. The pilot attempted to land at a nearby airport but the airplane was too high and fast for landing. The engine lost power during a go-around attempt. Post accident examination did not reveal any fuel staining on the airplane. The vent lines and ports were unobstructed and the fuel tank filler cap seals were in good condition. Approximately 3 gallons of fuel were drained from the left tank; approximately 10.5 gallons were drained from the right fuel tank. According to the POH for the airplane, the total fuel system capacity is 65 gallons, with 5 gallons (2.5 for each tank) unusable. The fuel selector has three positions, OFF, LEFT, and RIGHT. The fuel selector was in the "LEFT" position at the accident site. Impact damage precluded functional testing of the engine and the fuel metering unit. Fueling records established that the airplane was filled to capacity before flight.
On December 29, 2003, at 2319 Pacific standard time, a Cessna 210, N6539X, collided with ground obstacles following a loss of engine power during a VFR go-around from runway 24 at the Rialto, California, airport. The aircraft was owned and operated by a private individual, who was the passenger on this flight, under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 91 of the Federal Aviation Regulations. The airplane sustained substantial damage. The airline transport pilot and the one passenger on board sustained minor injuries. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and an IFR flight plan had been filed for the personal cross-country flight that originated at the North Las Vegas, Nevada, airport about 2130, and was en route to Chino, California. The airplane owner was interviewed over the telephone by the National Transportation Safety Board investigator-in-charge on December 30, 2003. The owner stated that he had purchased the airplane that day and had been present during the pre-buy inspection. There were no discrepancies found during the inspection. The fuel tanks were filled to capacity at that time. The owner, who only had a rotorcraft rating on his private pilot certificate, had hired the pilot to fly the airplane from Las Vegas to Chino. Following departure from Las Vegas and the climb to altitude, the pilot and the owner noted that the right wing fuel gage was showing a lower than expected level, and, by the time the flight had reached Baker, California, (about halfway on the approximately 220-mile flight) the gage was indicating empty. The pilot switched the fuel selector to the left tank and continued on toward Chino, although both of them were somewhat alarmed by the apparent high fuel consumption. As the flight neared Rialto, the left fuel gage was reading a very low quantity and the pilot then declared the emergency. The pilot spiraled down over the airport, but was too high and fast for a landing on runway 24, and he began a go-around. The engine lost power just after the pilot moved the throttle forward and the airplane crashed into the fence and went out into the field. The owner/passenger submitted a NTSB Form 6120.1/2, Pilot/Operator Aircraft Accident Report. The pilot arrived at the airport and declined a check-out in the airplane. The owner suggested that they overnight in Las Vegas and depart the following morning, due to poor weather conditions in the area. The pilot told him that they would file an instrument flight plan into Chino Airport. At 2059, they fueled the right wing of the airplane with fuel; the left wing tank was full. After departure, they climbed to 8,000 feet mean sea level (msl). They were then advised to climb to 10,000 feet. During the climb, the pilot attempted to lean the mixture; however, the engine "acted like it wanted to quit." The pilot left the mixture in the "FULL RICH" position after attempting to lean the mixture five times. They continued toward their destination in IFR conditions that included snow. The pilot had the passenger check for ice on the wings; none was found. The weather deterorated and the airplane was unable to climb to 10,000 feet. The pilot was advised by the en route traffic controller that it would be necessary for them to climb to 10,000 feet for terrain clearance. As ice began to build on the wings, the airplane was vectored over Baker. The left tank fuel guage was indicating 1/4 tank full so the pilot switched the fuel selector to the "BOTH" position. Then, the engine sputtered. The pilot then moved the fuel selector to the "RIGHT" position and said something was wrong. The passenger used his flashlight to read the fuel selector positions, and then moved the selector into the "RIGHT" position. The airplane was over Daggett and ATC suggested that the pilot land the airplane. The pilot canceled his IFR clearance and proceeded VFR with flight following. Upon reaching Apple Valley VOR, the left fuel guage read 1/4 full. The pilot advised the Southern California TRACON sector controller that he would like to land at the nearest airport. He elected to land at Rialto. During the VFR approach, the airplane was too high to land. The pilot commenced a go-around; however, the engine failed. The pilot completed an emergency landing to a field. Rialto police officers responded to the accident site. According to the on scene incident commander, the pilot told the officers that he had somehow "ran out of gas" at 8,000 feet over the airport. He further told the officers that he did not understand how this happened since the fuel tanks had been filled prior to leaving Las Vegas. The pilot reported that he had spiraled down over the airport and had setup to land on runway 24. The airplane then impacted a chain link fence off the departure end of the runway and collided with several other obstacles prior to the airplane coming to rest in a field. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspectors from the Riverside, California, Flight Standards District Office examined the airplane on December 31. They reported that there was no fuel staining evident on the exterior of the airplane. About 10.5 gallons of fuel were drained from the right tank and approximately 3 gallons were recovered from the left tank. The fuel tank vent system, including the vented caps, were unobstructed; the anti-siphon check valve in the cap vents were normal. A fuel line fitting at one injector nozzle was disconnected and the electric fuel pump was then energized at HIGH setting and a continuous stream of fuel poured from the disconnected line. The fuel lines were intact from the tanks to the engine, with no evidence of leakage at any fitting, including the fittings downstream of the electric pump According to the Pilot Operating Handbook (POH) for the airplane, the fuel system is comprised of a fuel tank in each wing. The total system capacity is 65 gallons, with 5 gallons (2.5 for each tank) unusable. The fuel selector has three positions, OFF, LEFT, and RIGHT.
The pilot's inadequate in-flight planning/decision by his fuel mismanagement and his delay in initiating remedial action which resulted in fuel exhaustion and the loss of engine power.
Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database
Aviation Accidents App
In-Depth Access to Aviation Accident Reports
