Aviation Accident Summaries

Aviation Accident Summary ANC13LA066

King Salmon, AK, USA

Aircraft #1

N499K

CESSNA T207A

Analysis

The commercial pilot was conducting a scheduled commuter flight with six passengers on board the float-equipped airplane. The pilot began the takeoff going up the left side of the river and was aware of boats on the right side of the river. The pilot brought the airplane to the step-taxi position and then backed off the power with the intent to apply full power and take off once the airplane was past the boats. The airplane subsequently struck an18.5-ft open fishing boat and nosed over inverted in the water. The pilot and the passengers reported that they never saw the boat that the airplane hit. The boat operator reported that the boat was idling in neutral as it drifted downriver when he heard and then saw the airplane coming straight toward his boat. The boat operator put the boat into reverse to try to avoid the collision, but, as he backed the boat away, the airplane struck the front right side of it with its left float. The pilot noted that the boat (which was small and olive-drab colored) may have visually blended with other boats and seaplanes parked along the side of the river, and the boat operator said that seaplanes were sometimes difficult to hear when coming from downriver. Both the pilot and the boat operator were familiar with operating in the multiple-use waterway, and each of them were aware of the presence of both seaplane and boat traffic on the morning of the accident. There are no separate designated areas for seaplane traffic and boat traffic in the area in which the accident occurred, and there is no radio contact between the pilots and the boat operators. Although regulations specify right-of-way rules for aircraft and vessels conducting water operations and provide course alteration rules based on their respective positions, the pilot never saw the boat to determine its relative position, and, by the time the boat operator saw the airplane's position, the collision was imminent.

Factual Information

On July 21, 2013, about 1150 Alaska daylight time, N499K, a turbine-powered (Soloy Turbine Pac 780-1000-1 conversion), float-equipped Cessna T207A airplane collided with an 18.5-foot aluminum fishing boat and nosed over during takeoff in the Naknek River near the King Salmon Airport (PAKN), King Salmon, Alaska. The commercial pilot was uninjured, the six passengers on board the airplane received minor injuries, and the three occupants of the boat received minor injuries. The airplane sustained substantial damage. The airplane was registered to Katmai Air Leasing, LLC, and operated by Katmai Air under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 135. Instrument meteorological conditions prevailed, and the pilot obtained a special visual flight rules (SVFR) clearance from PAKN tower. The flight was originating at the time of the accident and was destined for Brooks Camp in the Katmai National Park and Preserve, Alaska. According to a passenger on board the airplane, the airplane first taxied downriver before turning around to begin its upriver takeoff. The pilot reported that, after he obtained the SVFR clearance and notified the PAKN tower that the flight would "proceed off the river," he began the takeoff going upriver. The pilot stated that he checked the area ahead for boats, saw several boats on the right side of the river, and began the takeoff on the left side of the river. The pilot said that, after bringing the airplane to the step-taxi position, he backed off the power with the intent to apply full power and take off once the airplane had passed the boats. The pilot said that he never saw the boat that the airplane hit. Information documented by the Alaska State Troopers who responded to the scene indicated that none of the airplane passengers, including the passenger sitting in the front seat next to the pilot, ever saw the boat. Shore witnesses interviewed by the Troopers reported that they saw the airplane head straight toward the boat. The airplane struck the boat and immediately nosed over in the water. The pilot stated that he opened the left side door and exited immediately. The airplane was inverted and sinking into the water, and, as passengers began appearing at the door, he pulled on each one as they came through the door. All passengers evacuated, the airplane sank to its floats, and the passengers and pilot stood on the belly of the airplane until help arrived. The boat operator said that, when he first heard the airplane and then turned and saw it, it was about 75 yards away and coming straight toward the boat on a path that looked like it would collide with the middle of the boat. The boat operator said that the boat's motor was idling in neutral as the boat drifted downriver and that he put it in reverse to try to move the boat out of the path of the airplane. The boat operator said that, as he backed the boat away, the airplane struck the front of it. The boat operator and his two fishing clients were thrown into the water and started swimming. The boat operator estimated that there were about 10 to 12 fishing boats in the area and said that several arrived quickly to help. Pre-recovery photographs of the airplane provided by the Alaska State Troopers and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) showed that the nose of the airplane's left float was crushed aft and upward, and an outboard section of the right wing was crushed and partially separated. The boat, which was a flat, olive-drab color with a white outboard motor, was crushed inward, upward, and aft on the front right side. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The pilot stated that he was unsure why he did not see the boat before the collision and that he wondered if it may have come out from the left into the path of the airplane or if it may have visually blended with the other boats and aircraft that were parked on docks along the left side of the river. The boat operator said that it is sometimes difficult to hear the airplanes when they are coming from downriver. The boat operator said that it had been foggy earlier that morning and that "lots of airplanes" were trying "to get out and get caught up." A passenger on the accident airplane, who had arrived in King Salmon on an earlier flight, stated that some flights were delayed because of the weather. In response to a question if any of the boats on the river that day appeared to have any high-visibility markings, the passenger stated that the boats he saw appeared to be "plain boats." The PAKN airport manager said that the area where the accident occurred was not on airport property and that there are no separate designated areas for seaplane traffic and boat traffic there. The Airport/Facility Directory for the King Salmon seaplane base notes, "Landing area Rwy NW-SE also used by boats." The boat operator said that the airplanes take off and land "wherever they want to" and that there is no radio contact between the pilots and the boat operators. Weather conditions reported at PAKN, about 1 mile from the accident site, at 1154 included wind from 050 degrees at 6 knots, visibility 10 miles, and ceilings broken at 700 and 1,300 feet. Title 14 CFR 91.115, which specifies right-of-way rules for water operations, states that "[e]ach person operating an aircraft on water shall, insofar as possible, keep clear of all vessels and avoid impeding their navigation and shall give way to any vessel or other aircraft that is given the right-of-way by any rule of this section." The regulation provides right-of-way and course-alteration rules that address crossing, head-on, and overtaking scenarios. According to FAA Handbook 8083-23, "Seaplane, Skiplane, and Float/Ski Equipped Helicopter Operations Handbook," section 1-2, seaplanes (which meet the general definition of "vessel") are also subject to U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) commandant instruction M16672.2D, "Navigation Rules, International-Inland." USCG M16672.2D, Part B, Section I, Rule 5, "Look-out" states, "[e]very vessel shall at all times maintain a proper look-out by sight and hearing as well as by all available means appropriate in the prevailing circumstances and conditions so as to make a full appraisal of the situation and of the risk of collision." Rule 6, "Safe Speed" states, "[e]very vessel shall at all times proceed at a safe speed…[to enable] proper and effective action to avoid collision…. In determining a safe speed, the following factors shall be among those taken into account:…the traffic density, including concentration of…any other vessels." FAA Handbook 8083-23, section 3-4, notes that "[s]eaplanes often operate in areas with extensive recreational or commercial water traffic. …There is no equivalent of the airport traffic pattern to govern boat traffic…."

Probable Cause and Findings

The pilot’s inadequate visual lookout while departing from a multiple-use waterway, which resulted in a collision with a drifting boat. Contributing to the accident were the lack of visual conspicuity of the boat and the limited amount of time the boat operator had to maneuver the boat once he heard and saw the oncoming airplane.

 

Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database

Get all the details on your iPhone or iPad with:

Aviation Accidents App

In-Depth Access to Aviation Accident Reports