Aviation Accident Summaries

Aviation Accident Summary CEN14LA411

Waterville, MN, USA

Aircraft #1

N4118X

HANSON LONN AVID AMPHIBIAN

Analysis

The noncertificated pilot reported that he was testing the amphibious airplane's engine and cooling system while maneuvering the airplane on a nearby lake. He added that he had "no intent to fly." The pilot completed a number of passes across the lake. Before the last pass, he input full flaps, which resulted in the airplane inadvertently becoming airborne and climbing to about 100 ft. The pilot attempted to steer away from trees, but he lost control of the airplane, which then impacted terrain. A postaccident examination of the airplane revealed no mechanical anomalies.

Factual Information

On August 2, 2014, about 1100 central daylight time, an Avid Amphibian, N4118X, impacted a lake after an inadvertent takeoff. The non-certificated pilot received serious injuries and the passenger was not injured. The airplane was registered to and operated by the non-certificated pilot under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 as a personal flight. The airplane was substantially damaged. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident, and no flight plan had been filed. The non-certificated pilot reported he drove the airplane to a nearby lake to "drive it like a boat" to test the engine and cooling system. The pilot did not hold an aircraft mechanics license and the airplane was not current with airworthiness inspections. The pilot stated he "had no intent to fly." The pilot made four passes across the lake and reported the engine was operating well but was overheating; he had to turn the engine off to cool after each pass. For the last pass, the pilot input full flaps to "see if it would get the plane faster" to assist in cooling. The airplane became airborne and climbed above 100 feet. The pilot attempted to "steer" away from trees but "could not make the airplane turn." He was unable to control the airplane; he cut the throttle and impacted terrain. According to a post-accident examination by an FAA inspector, there were no mechanical anomalies with the airplane. In the pilot's written statement to the National Transportation Safety Board he noted that the accident might have been prevented if he had solicited a certificated pilot or mechanic to test the engine or he had received pilot training to be proficient when the airplane took off.

Probable Cause and Findings

The noncertificated pilot’s failure to maintain airplane control after an inadvertent takeoff, which resulted in collision with terrain.

 

Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database

Get all the details on your iPhone or iPad with:

Aviation Accidents App

In-Depth Access to Aviation Accident Reports