Eltopia, WA, USA
N3376
DESTINY 2000
The flight instructor and student pilot were departing in the powered parachute during a fly-in event with the student pilot at the flight controls. The flight instructor reported that the powered parachute experienced left-to-right wing oscillations during the takeoff roll and initial climb and that, about 15 ft above ground level, it rotated sharply downward and to the right and then impacted terrain; this was corroborated by video footage provided by an observer on the ground, which also showed that the oscillations worsened during the initial climb. The flight instructor reported that he was monitoring all of the parachute lines during the takeoff roll and initial climb and that he observed no abnormalities that would have adversely affected the parachute's steering mechanism. According to Federal Aviation Administration guidance on powered parachute operations, the takeoff should be aborted if the parachute experiences severe wing oscillations. The guidance also states that "dual controls are required in the aircraft for training." However, the powered parachute was not equipped with dual flight controls. If the powered parachute had been equipped with dual flight controls, it is possible that the flight instructor would have taken control of the flight and aborted the takeoff. Regardless, the flight instructor should have told the student to abort the takeoff when he first noticed the wing oscillations.
On May 23, 2015, about 1430 pacific daylight time, a Destiny 2000 powered parachute, N3376, impacted terrain during the initial climb from a field near Eltopia, Washington. The flight instructor sustained minor injuries, and the student pilot sustained serious injuries. Day visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed for the instructional flight, which was operated under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. According to the flight instructor, the aircraft experienced left to right oscillations during the takeoff roll and initial climb, and about 15 feet above ground level, the parachute rotated sharply downward and to the right. The aircraft impacted terrain in a right bank and nose-low attitude. The student pilot was at the flight controls for the entire duration of the flight, and stated in a postaccident interview that he did not make any abrupt control inputs during the takeoff or initial climb. The flight instructor stated that dual flight controls were not installed, and he could not reach the throttle lever. The flight instructor provided a video recording of the accident sequence, which was filmed by an observer on the ground. The footage depicted the accident aircraft experiencing left to right wing oscillations throughout the takeoff roll and the rotation. During the initial climb, the oscillations continued and the aircraft rolled sharply downward and to the right, eventually moving out of the video recorders view. The flight instructor stated there were no mechanical malfunctions or failures with the powered parachute that would have precluded normal operation. In addition, he reported that he was monitoring all parachute lines during the takeoff roll and initial climb, and observed no line-overs or any other abnormalities that would have adversely affected the parachute's steering mechanism. The reported winds at an airport 11 nautical miles away about the time of the accident were from 210 degrees true at 7 knots. The flight instructor reported that he observed a steady direct headwind about 4 to 7 knots before takeoff. During the video, about one minute before the accident powered parachute lifted off, an observer could be heard stating, "The wind has basically come down to nothing." ADDITIONAL INFORMATION According to the Federal Aviation Administration Powered Parachute Flying Handbook (FAA-H-8083-29), "An oscillating wing forced into takeoff will most likely roll the airframe," and "if the oscillations become too severe, it is best to abort the takeoff and set up again." The handbook additionally states, "Dual controls are required in the aircraft for training."
The flight instructor’s failure to tell the student pilot to abort the takeoff after the powered parachute experienced wing oscillations, which resulted in the student pilot’s loss of aircraft control during initial climb and subsequent impact with terrain. Contributing to the accident was the flight instructor's decision to conduct training in a powered parachute without dual flight controls.
Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database
Aviation Accidents App
In-Depth Access to Aviation Accident Reports
