Gettysburg, PA, USA
N3647S
CESSNA 172E
The private pilot, who was also the airplane owner, was conducting a local personal flight. About 30 minutes after takeoff, during a descent from 3,000 to 1,500 ft mean sea level, the airplane experienced a total loss of engine power; the pilot then attempted a forced landing to a grass field. The airplane's approach speed was too fast for landing and the airplane overflew the selected field, eventually impacting trees at the edge of an adjacent field. Subsequent examination of the airframe and engine revealed no evidence of any preimpact mechanical anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. Before the accident flight, the airplane had been stored for an extended period with automotive fuel in the tanks. Although long-term storage with automotive fuel can lead to varnish or gum deposits that may block or restrict fuel flow, the newly-replaced carburetor was found full of fuel with no foreign material or deposits present, and fuel was observed to flow freely from the fuel tanks to the carburetor during postaccident testing. The weather conditions at the time of the accident were conducive to the formation of serious carburetor icing at glide engine power settings when using aviation-grade gasoline. Given that the use of automotive gasoline is known to result in the formation of carburetor icing at higher ambient temperature and lower humidity conditions than aviation gasoline, it is likely that the loss of engine power was the result of carburetor icing.
On September 19, 2015, at 1043 eastern daylight time, a privately owned and operated Cessna 172E, N3647S, was substantially damaged during a forced landing to a soybean field after a total loss of engine power near Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. The private pilot and pilot-rated passenger received serious injuries. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed for the local personal flight that departed from Waltz Field (34PA), Gettysburg, Pennsylvania about 1015. The airplane was being operated under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91.The pilot-rated passenger stated that prior to departure, during the engine run-up, the engine ran "a little rough" when operated on one of the two magnetos. The pilot continued the run up until the engine operated smoothly on the left, right, and both magnetos. He recalled that the engine operated "remarkably smooth" for takeoff, climb and while performing various maneuvers. After descending from 3,000 feet to about 1,500 feet above mean sea level, the engine started to "shake, rumble, spit, and sputter and then just quit." The passenger further recalled that the pilot did not reduce engine power from its previous setting of around 2,400 rpm during the descent, nor did he apply carburetor heat. After the engine lost power, the pilot attempted to land in a nearby grass field, however the approach was too fast. He overflew the grass field, then touched down in an adjacent soybean field, the airplane bounced, veered left, and collided with the tree line at the edge of the field. According to Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) records, the pilot held a private pilot certificate with ratings for airplane single-engine land and instrument airplane. His most recent FAA third-class medical certificate had expired, it was issued on December 29, 2010, at which time he reported a total of 2,096 hours of flight experience. The four-seat, single-engine, high-wing airplane was manufactured in 1963, and was equipped with a Continental O-300D, 145-horsepower reciprocating engine. The maintenance logbooks were not recovered. FAA airworthiness records showed that the airplane had been modified to operate with automotive gasoline in accordance with a supplemental type certificate. According to a mechanic, an annual inspection of the airplane was completed in July 2013, after which the airplane had accrued about 1 hour of flight prior to the next annual inspection, which was completed by him on September 11, 2015. During the interval between the two inspections, automotive fuel remained in the fuel tanks. Maintenance documents provided by the mechanic revealed that the carburetor had been replaced, seals in the fuel selector valve and gascolator were replaced, the automotive fuel was drained and 15 gallons of 100 low-lead aviation fuel was added to the fuel tanks, just prior to the September 2015 annual inspection. Afterwards, the engine operated satisfactorily during ground tests. The accident flight was the first flight after the maintenance and inspection. Examination of the airplane revealed that the left wing was partially separated from the fuselage, rotated about 45 degrees aft, and exhibited leading edge crush damage. The right wing remained attached, exhibited leading edge crush damage, and the right aileron was separated from the wing. The empennage was partially separated from the fuselage near the aft bulkhead of the cargo compartment. Flight control cable continuity was confirmed for pitch and yaw from the cockpit controls to the respective control surfaces, while the aileron control cables exhibited fractures in each wing consistent with tension overload. The left fuel tank was breached, and about 2 gallons of fuel were drained from it during recovery operations. An unknown amount of fuel had leaked from the right wing after the accident. The gascolator and carburetor were full of a yellowish-amber fluid similar in color and odor as automotive fuel. The fuel inlet screen was unobstructed, and no water was present. Air pressure was applied to the gascolator outlet and fluid was observed flowing through the fractured fuel lines at the door pillars near the wing attach points. The carburetor needle valve and seat were clean with no debris found. When manually operated, fluid was observed exiting out of the carburetor accelerator pump. The carburetor main fuel nozzle was absent of debris. The fluid observed throughout the fuel system was yellowish-amber in color with an odor consistent with automotive fuel. One of the propeller blades was bent aft at its tip. Neither blade exhibited a pattern of chordwise scratching or leading edge damage. The propeller was rotated by hand and thumb suction and compression was observed on all cylinders. Continuity of the crankshaft was confirmed to the rear accessory pad. The top spark plugs were removed and appeared grey to slightly black in color with normal wear when checked against the Champion Check-A-Plug chart. Both magnetos produced spark on all towers when rotated by hand. The air inlet box was clean and free of obstructions. The throttle, mixture, and carburetor heat controls were securely attached to the engine and moved freely. The oil quantity dipstick indicated 6 quarts. A weather observation recorded at Fountain Dale Heliport (RYT), Fountain Dale, Pennsylvania, at 1053 included: temperature 23 degrees C (73 F), dew point 18 degrees C (64 F), and an altimeter setting of 29.95 inches of mercury. According to an FAA Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin, these weather conditions are conducive to serious carburetor icing at glide power settings. FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 91-33A, Use of Alternate Grades of Aviation for Grade 80/87, and Use of Automotive Gasoline, provided operational information regarding the use of automotive fuels in aircraft. According to the AC, "Long-term fuel storage of automotive gasoline in aircraft fuel tanks should be avoided. Although automotive gasolines have lower maximum existent gum specification requirements than aviation gasoline, either fuel can form undesirable gum deposits over long-term storage under particularly severe conditions, such as in barrels and at high temperature. Gum deposits thus formed could result in engine malfunctions." The AC further stated, "FAA Technical Center testing indicates that carburetor icing will occur in less time and at higher ambient temperatures with automotive gasoline than with aviation gasoline. Therefore, pilots using automotive gasoline should be familiar with the induction system icing prevention procedures of the FAA Advisory Circular AC 20-113 and be prepared to use these procedures at higher ambient temperatures and lower humidities than when using aviation gasolines."
The total loss of engine power due to carburetor icing. Contributing to the accident was the pilot's failure to maintain a proper approach speed during the forced landing, which resulted in impact with trees.
Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database
Aviation Accidents App
In-Depth Access to Aviation Accident Reports
