Bozeman, MT, USA
N621ZC
DIAMOND AIRCRAFT IND INC DA 42 NG
N7709H
PIPER PA 12
The tailwheel-equipped airplane had completed a series of touch-and-go takeoffs and landings with the student pilot in the front seat and flight instructor in the rear seat. The airplane was equipped with large tundra tires which, in combination with the tailwheel configuration, provided limited forward visibility when on the ground. The tower controller cleared the pilots to cross the landing runway, and then subsequently cleared the airplane across the parallel runway, which led it onto a taxiway where a low-wing airplane, having just cleared the parallel runway after landing, was stopped and preparing to contact ground control. Neither of the pilots onboard the tailwheel airplane saw the low-wing airplane before they collided with it on the taxiway, resulting in substantial damage to both airplanes. The student pilot stated that he perceived that he should expedite the taxi across the parallel runway due to airplanes on approach to that runway, although review of air traffic control voice recordings revealed that the controller issued no instructions to expedite the taxi. Because of the faster taxi speed, the pilots did not perform any "S"-turn maneuvers to enhance forward visibility, which likely would have allowed them to see the low-wing airplane and prevented the collision.
On April 4, 2018, at 1229 mountain daylight time, a Piper PA-12, N7709H, collided with a Diamond Aircraft Inc. DA42 NG, N621ZC, during taxi at Bozeman Yellowstone International Airport (BZN), Bozeman, Montana. Both airplanes sustained substantial damage. Neither the student pilot or the flight instructor in the PA-12, nor the flight instructor and pilot receiving instruction in the DA-42 were injured. Both airplanes were operated as Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 instructional flights. The pilots of the DA-42 were conducting an instrument approach for runway 12 and the tower controller cleared the airplane to land. The PA-12, which had been conducting touch-and-go takeoffs and landings in the pattern for runway 11, requested to switch to runway 12 and was instructed by the tower to follow the DA-42 for landing on runway 12. Shortly thereafter, the controller contacted the PA-12, advised that they were unable to approve a landing on runway 12, and cleared the airplane to land on runway 11. The PA-12 subsequently landed on runway 11 and was instructed to taxi back to the approach end. Over the next minute, the tower controller provided a landing clearance to another airplane that was on the right downwind leg for runway 12, and then instructed the DA-42, which had landed, to exit runway 12 and contact the ground controller. The DA-42 exited the runway at taxiway A3 and stopped short of taxiway A. At this time, while two airplanes were now in the final approach stages for landing on runway 12, the tower controller cleared the PA-12 to cross runway 11 and hold short of runway 12. Shortly thereafter, the controller cleared the PA-12 to cross runway 12 and contact the ground controller. At this time, the DA-42 was still stationary on taxiway A3, and about 30 seconds later, the controller exclaimed, "09H, STOP;" however, the PA-12 collided with the tail of the DA-42. At the time of the collision, the DA-42 was positioned about 220 ft beyond the runway 12 hold short lines (440 ft from the edge of runway 12). According to the instructor onboard the DA-42, after landing on runway 12, they were instructed to exit at taxiway A3 and hold short of taxiway A. After exiting at A3, he stated that they stopped short of A, and just as they were switching to the ground control frequency, they felt a collision. Neither pilot onboard the DA-42 saw the airplane that struck them. Both the student and instructor onboard the PA-12 stated that the tower controller issued a clearance to cross runway 12 while they were still holding short of runway 11. As such, they felt pressure to perform a fast taxi and did not execute the typical "S"-turns for enhanced forward visibility. Air traffic control audio recordings revealed that the tower controller issued the PA-12 with progressive instructions to hold short of and cross runway 11, and subsequently, to hold short of and then cross runway 12. Those instructions were read back correctly by the student as the taxi progressed, and at no time did the tower controller provide the PA-12 with instructions to expedite the taxi. Both occupants stated that they did not see the DA-42 on the taxiway. The instructor did notice the student pilot glance down at the instrument panel to switch to the ground control frequency just before the impact. The airport was equipped with four runways, including the parallel runways 12/30 and 11/29. Taxiway A3 branched from runway 12, 4,300 ft beyond the displaced threshold. It was 630 ft long and connected runway 12 to the parallel taxiway A. Taxiway C3 was directly in line with A3 and connected the landing threshold of runway 11 to runway 12 at midfield. (see Figure 1.) The Piper PA-12 was a high-wing, single-engine airplane with a tandem seating configuration and was equipped with conventional (tailwheel) landing gear and tundra tires. The student pilot was seated in the front seat, and the instructor in one of the rear seats. The instructor stated that the forward visibility from the front seat was limited and that the forward visibility from the rear seats was even worse. Figure 1. Landing and Taxi Paths
The student pilot and flight instructor's failure to see and avoid the stationary airplane during taxi, which resulted in a ground collision.
Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database
Aviation Accidents App
In-Depth Access to Aviation Accident Reports
